Return to Free Library

Return to Human Life Menu

Previous Article                                                                         Next Article

 

In this article we will continue to discuss the human life cycle and human relationships.  We have been discussing the consciousness of humans in the womb, at birth, in infancy, childhood, youth, adulthood, parenting, and regarding family dynamics.

For this article and the next we will discuss the topics of sex and sexuality in relation to the dynamics of adult human relationships.

In Article 203 we discussed sexual energy transfers in relation to the spiritual energy centers or chakras.  In this article we will discuss some psychological aspects of sex, monogamy, promiscuity and sexuality.

 

 

Magnetic Attraction Between Opposite Sexes

“We use the term ‘magnetic attraction’ to indicate that in your bisexual natures there is that which is of polarity.

This polarity may be seen to be variable according to the male/female polarization of each entity, be each entity biologically male or female.

Thus you may see the magnetism when two entities with the appropriate balance, male/female versus female/male polarity, meeting and thus feeling the attraction which polarized forces will exert, one upon the other.

This is the strength of the bisexual mechanism.

It does not take an act of will to decide to feel attraction for one who is oppositely polarized sexually.

It will occur in an inevitable sense giving the free flow of energy a proper avenue.

This avenue may be blocked by some distortion towards a belief/condition which states to the entity that this attraction is not desired.

However, the basic mechanism functions as simply as would the magnet and the iron.”1

 

 

The Advantages of this Magnetic Attraction

“The bisexual knowing of the Creator by Itself has the potential for two advantages.

Firstly, in the green-ray activated being there is the potential for a direct and simple analog of what you may call joy, the spiritual or metaphysical nature which exists in intelligent energy.  This is a great aid to comprehension of a truer nature of beingness.

The other potential advantage of bisexual reproductive acts is the possibility of a sacramental understanding or connection with the gateway to intelligent infinity, for with appropriate preparation, work in what you may call magic may be done and experiences of intelligent infinity may be had.

The positively oriented individuals concentrating upon this method of reaching intelligent infinity, then, through the seeking or the act of will, are able to direct this infinite intelligence to the work these entities desire to do, whether it be knowledge of service or ability to heal or whatever service to others is desired.

These are two advantages of this particular method of the Creator experiencing Itself.

As we have said before, the corollary of the strength of this particular energy transfer is that it opens the door, shall we say, to the individual mind/body/spirit complexes’ desire to serve in an infinite number of ways an other-self, thus polarizing towards positive.”2

 

 

Sexual Biases Imprinted due to Early Sexual Experiences

“Due to the nature of solitary sexual experiences, it is in most cases unlikely that what you call masturbation has an imprinting effect upon later experiences.

This is similarly true with some of the encounters which might be seen as homosexual among those of a very young age group. These are often, instead, innocent exercises in curiosity.

However, it is quite accurate that the first experience in which the mind/body/spirit complex is intensely involved will indeed imprint upon the entity for that life experience a set of preferences.”3

 

 

Male & Female Sexual Peaks

“The male, as you call this polarity, has an extremely active yellow-ray (3rd chakra) desire at the space/time in its incarnation when its sperm is the most viable and full of the life-giving spermata.

Thusly the red ray (1st chakra) seeks to reproduce most thickly at the time when this body is most able to fulfill the red-ray requirements.

The yellow-ray, chemical body complex of the female, as you call this polarity, must needs have a continued and increasing desire for the sexual intercourse for it can only conceive once in one fifteen to eighteen month period, given that it carries the conceived body complex, bears it, and suckles it. This is draining to the physical body of yellow ray.

To compensate for this the desire increases so that the yellow-ray body is predisposed to continue in sexual congress, thus fulfilling its red-ray requirement to reproduce as thickly as possible.

The more, shall we say, integral sexuality or polarity of the body complex, which is a portion of the mind/body/spirit complex, does not concern itself with these yellow-ray manifestations but rather follows the ways of the seeking of energy transfer and the furthering of aid and service to others.”4

 

 

Monogamy

“It was the intention of the original Logoi [Galactic Mind/Consciousness] that entities mate with one another in any fashion which caused a greater polarization [spiritual evolution].

It was determined, after observation of the process of many Galaxies (Logoi), that polarization increased many fold if the mating were not indiscriminate.

Consequent Galaxies (Logoi) thusly preserved a bias towards the mated relationship which is more characteristic of more disciplined personalities and of what you may call higher densities.

The free will of each entity, however, was always paramount and a bias only could be offered.

The third-density physical vehicle which is the basic incarnational tool of manifestation upon your planet arose from entities thusly imprinted, all the aforesaid being designed by the Logos.

The free will of third-density entities is far stronger than the rather mild carryover from second-density DNA encoding and it is not part of the conscious nature of many of your mind/body/spirit complexes to be monogamous due to the exercise of free will.

However, as has been noted there are many signposts in the deep mind indicating to the alert adept the more efficient use of catalyst.

As we have said, the Galaxy [Logos] of your peoples has a bias towards kindness.”5

 

 

Love & Sex – Loyalty & Promiscuity

“Love is a biological necessity, a force operating to one degree or another in all biological life.

Without love there is no physical commitment to life – no psychic hold.

Love exists whether or not it is sexually expressed, though it is natural for love to seek expression.

Love implies loyalty.  It implies commitment.

This applies to lesbian and homosexual relationships as well as to heterosexual ones.

In your society, however, identity is so related to sexual stereotypes that few people know themselves well enough to understand the nature of love, and to make any such commitments.

A transitory period is currently taking place, in which women seem to seek the promiscuous sexual freedom more generally granted to men.

It is believed that males are naturally promiscuous, aroused by sexual stimuli almost completely divorced from any complementary “deeper” response.

The male, then, is thought to want sex whether or not he has any love response to the woman in question – or sometimes to desire her precisely because he does not love her.

In such cases, sex becomes not an expression of love, but an expression of derision or scorn.

So women, accepting these ideas often, seek for a situation in which they too can feel free to express their sexual desires openly, whether or not love is involved.

Yet loyalty is love’s partner, and the primates display such evidence in varying degrees.

The male in particular has been taught to separate love and sex, so that a schizophrenic condition results that tears apart his psyche – in operational terms – as he lives his life.

The expression of sexuality is considered male, while the expression of love is not considered manly.

To some extent or another, then, the male feels forced to divide the expression of his love from the expression of his sexuality.  It would be disastrous for women to follow the same course.

This great division has led to your major wars.

This does not mean that men were alone responsible for wars.

It does mean that the male so divorced himself from the common fountain of love and sex that the repressed energy came forth in those aggressive acts of cultural rape and death, instead of birth.

In so distorting your ideas of sex, you further limit the great capacities of human loyalty, which is always connected with love and love’s expression.”6

 

 

Sexual Freedom

“Sexual freedom does not involve an enforced promiscuity in which young people, for example, are made to feel unnatural if their encounters with the other sex do no lead to bed.

You begin to program sexual activity when you divorce it from love and devotion.

I am not saying here that any given sexual performance is “wrong”, or meaningless, or debased, if it is not accompanied by the sentiments of love and devotion.

Over a period of time, however, the expression of sex will follow the inclinations of the heart.

To that degree, it is “unnatural” to have sexual desire for someone whom you dislike or look down upon.”7

 

 

Sex & Reproduction

“Sexual union that leads to a couple having a child or not is random within certain limits.

If an entity has reached the seniority whereby it chooses the basic structure of the life experience, this entity may then choose to incarnate in a physical complex which is not capable of reproduction.

Thus we find some entities which have chosen to be unfertile.

Other entities, through free will, make use of various devices to insure nonfertility.

Except for these conditions, the condition [of pregnancy] is random.”8

 

“You cannot separate biology from your own belief systems.  The interplay is too vital.

If each act of intercourse were meant to produce a child, you would have overrun the planet before you began.

Sexual activity is therefore also meant as enjoyment, as an expression of pure exuberance.

Not all sexual activity is meant to end in childbirth – which is a biological impossibility, and would represent planetary catastrophe.

So the species is blessed, if you will, with many avenues for sexual expression.”9

 

 

Love & Sex

“Each species is involved in a cooperative venture, upon which ultimately all earthly existence rests.

This cooperation that I speak of is based on love, and that love has a biological as well as a spiritual basis.

The love and cooperation that forms the basis of all life shows itself in many ways.

Sexuality represents one aspect, and an important one.

In larger terms, it is as natural for a man to love a man, and for a woman to love a woman, as it is to show love for the opposite sex.

For that matter, it is more natural to be bisexual.  Such is the “natural” nature of the species.

Instead, you have put love into very definite categories, so that its existence is right only under the most limited conditions.

Love goes underground, but springs up in distorted forms and exaggerated tendencies.

Presently, at least in the Western world, you equate sex and love.

You imagine that sexual expression is the only one natural to love.

Love, in other words, must it seems, express itself exclusively through the exploration, in one way or another, of the beloved’s sexual portions.

This is hardly the only limitation placed upon love’s expression, however.

There are innumerable books written with instructions, each proclaiming the said methods to be the proper ones.

Certain kinds of orgasm are “the best.”

Love’s expression is furthermore permitted only between members of the opposite sex.

Generally speaking, these individuals must be more or less of the same age.

There are other taboos, involving racial restrictions, or cultural, social, and economic ones.

If this were not enough, large segments of the population believe that sex is wrong to begin with – a spiritual debasement, allowed by God only so that the species can continue.

Since love and sex are equated, obvious conflicts arise.

Mother love is the only category that is considered wholesome, and therefore nonsexual under most conditions.

A father can feel very guilty about his love for his children, for he has been conditioned to believe that love is expressed only through sex, or else it is unmanly.

Sexual encounters are a natural part of love’s expression, but they are not the limit of love’s expressions.

Again, it is natural to express love through sexual acts – natural and good.

It is not natural to express love only through sexual acts.”10

 

 

Love & Sexuality

“I am stressing the fact that love and sexuality are not necessarily the same thing.

Sex is love’s expression, but it is only one of love’s expressions.

Sometimes it is quite “natural” to express love in another way.

Because of the connotations of the world “sex,” however, it may seem to some of you that I am advocating a promiscuous sexual relationship with “no holes barred”.

Instead, I am saying that deeper bonds of biological and spiritual love lie at the basis of all personal and cultural relationships, a love that transcends your ideas of sexuality.”11

 

 

Problems Arising From Artificially Dividing Love and Sexuality

“Again, all love is not sexually oriented.

Yet love naturally seeks expression, and one such expression is through sexual activities.

When love and sexuality are artificially divided, however, or considered as antagonistic to each other, then all kinds of problems arise:

 

Permanent Relationships

Permanent relationships become most difficult to achieve under such conditions, and often love finds little expression, while one of its most natural channels is closed off.

 

Children

Many children give their greatest expression of love to toys, dolls, or imaginary playmates, because so many stereotyped patterns have already limited other expression.

Their feelings toward parents become ambiguous as a result of the identification procedures thrust upon them.

Love, sexuality, and play, curiosity and explorative characteristics, merge in the child in a natural manner.

Yet it soon learns that areas of exploration are limited even as far as its own body is concerned.

The child is not free to contemplate its own parts.

The body is early forbidden territory, so that the child feels it is wrong to love itself in any fashion.

Ideas of love, then, become highly distorted, and its expression also.

 

Men & Women

Men brought up to be ashamed of the “feminine” sides of their nature cannot be expected to love women.

They will see in women instead the despised, feared, and yet charged aspects of their own reality, and behave accordingly in their relationships.

Women taught to be frightened of the “masculine” sides of their nature cannot be expected to love men, either, and the same kind of behavior results.

The so-called war of the sexes originates in the artificial divisions that you have placed about the nature of the self.

The psyche’s reality is beyond such misunderstandings.  Its native language usually escapes you.  It is closely connected with what can be loosely called the language of love.”12

 

 

Those who Feel Sex is Depraved, Evil or Wrong

“Sexual behavior obviously will be considered depraved by those most afraid of their own sensual natures.

They will ascribe it to primitive or evil or unconscious sources, and even attempt to censor their dreams in that regard.

They will then project the greatest sexual license upon those groups they choose to represent their own repressed behavior.

If sex is equated with evil, the other group will of course be considered evil.

If the members of such a rigid group believe that youth is innocent, then they will deny sexual experience as having any place in childhood, and alter their own memories to fit their beliefs.

If a young adult believes that sex is good but old age is bad, then he or she will find it impossible to consider exuberant sexuality as a portion of an older person’s experience.”13

 

 

Programmed Sexual Beliefs that Lead to Confusion

“On the one hand many of you have been taught that sexual expression is wrong, evil, or debasing.

You have also been told that if you do not express your sexuality, you are displaying unnatural repression, and furthermore you are led to think that you must above all force yourself to enjoy this ambiguous sexual nature.

The old idea that good women do not enjoy sex has hardly disappeared.

Yet women are taught that natural expressions of love, playful caresses, are inappropriate unless an immediate follow-through to a sexual climax is given.

Men are taught to count their worth according to the strength of the sexual drive and its conquests.

They are taught to inhibit the expression of love as a weakness, and yet to perform sexually as often as possible.

In such a sexual climate there is little wonder that you become confused.”14

 

 

Sexual Obsessions

“You are so obsessed with sexual behavior when you proclaim it evil or distasteful or debasing, hide it, and pretend that it is primarily “animalistic.”

You are also obsessed with sexual behavior when you proclaim its merits in an exaggerated fashion from the marketplace.

You are obsessed with sexual behavior when you put tight, unrealistic bans upon its expression, and also when you set up just as unrealistic standards of active performance to which the normal person is expected to comply.”15

 

 

Dominance & Submission

“The sexual ideas of domination and submission have no part in the natural life of your species, or that of the animals.  Again, you interpret animal behavior according to your own beliefs.

Dominance and submission have often been used in religious literature in periods when love and devotion were separated from sexuality.

They became unified only through religious vision or experiences, for only God’s love was seen as “good enough” to justify a sexuality otherwise felt to be animalistic.

Instead, the words “domination” and “submission” have to do with areas of consciousness and its development.

You adopted a prominent line of consciousness that to a certain extent was bent upon dominating nature.  You considered this male in essence.

The female principle then became connected with the earth and all those elements of its life over which you as a species hoped to gain power.

God, therefore, became male.

The love and devotion that might otherwise be connected with the facets of nature and the female principle had to be “snatched away from” any natural attraction to sexuality.

In such a way, religion, echoing your state of consciousness, was able to harness the powers of love and used them for purposes of domination.

They became state-oriented.

A man’s love and devotion was a political gain.

Fervor was as important as a governments’ treasury, for a state could count upon the devotion of its lieutenants in the same way that many fanatics will work without money for a cause.”16

 

 

Wilhelm Reich, Sex Research & the Libido

Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957) found that sexuality and anxiety represent opposite directions of vegetative excitation.

(James Strick notes, “The term ‘vegetative’ refers to involuntary activity of the autonomic nervous system; it has nothing to do with plants.”)

In sexuality, excitation seemed to be moving outwards.

In anxiety, excitation seemed to be moving inwards, to the sympathetic ganglia at the core of the organism.

“Reich thought it significant that all organisms, when in an anxiety state, roll up into a spherical form and draw in all extended parts that they can.”

Reich “thought the movement of energy, and the direction in which it moved, more likely to be the fundamental driver of emotions and libido.  It was movement, and not the underlying details of structure or biochemistry, that most attracted his attention.”17

“Reich noted that frequency of sexual intercourse alone was not the key element in prevention of neurotic symptoms; rather, it was whether the sexual contact produced was completely gratifying, whether all the dammed-up excitation was fully discharged.”18

This he termed “orgastic potency”.

Reich said, “The important issue, hygienically is not that the patient have coitus, but that the experience satisfy fully.  I conceived of sexuality as a river, which springs from natural sources and has to follow a certain course.  Sexual release in the sex act must correspond to the excitement which leads up to it.  If one constructs artificial damns which impede the normal course of the river, it will flood its banks and do damage.  Sexual energy which is bound up, like quantities of water behind a dam, spills over into…sexual aberrations (child seduction, rape, sex murder), insomnia…compulsive behavior, anxiety states, menstrual disorders, impotence, frigidity, premature ejaculation, etc.”

 

James Strick writes, “The ‘water’ driving neurotic symptoms, then, was not original sexual libido converted into some other form of energy, in Reich’s understanding.  It was the same ‘water’ as before, merely turning different mills because of having been diverted out of its natural channel.”19

“Reich himself dealt with male patients who bragged of how much sex they had, so at first this seemed to contradict libido theory.  However, when Reich inquired in more specific detail, he found those men ‘were erectively very potent, but ejaculation was accompanied by little or no pleasure, or even the opposite, by disgust and unpleasant sensations…He concluded that the key to relief of neurotic symptoms was ‘orgastic potency’ not merely having sex (in any quantity), but the ability to completely discharge the dammed-up sexual tension in a fully gratifying sex act.  He claimed that very few analysts would take the trouble to question their patients in so much detail.”20

“Reich came to believe that unhealthy social conditions were producing neurosis on a mass scale and that prevention via social reforms would be far more effective than individual therapy for people already damaged…The working class, in particular, suffered from hysterical, compulsive, and violent behaviors that Reich thought were produced by their living conditions.  Many people sleeping in one room, for example, allowed very few to have a gratifying love life undisturbed.”21

In regards to masochism Reich “thought it was a desperate response of an organism so trapped by guilt and muscular rigidity that it could feel pleasure only from a feeling of being cut or pricked open.”

 

 

 

  1. Elkins, Rueckert, McCarty, The Law of One, Session 31.7, http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=31
  2. Elkins, Rueckert, McCarty, The Law of One, Session 31.3, http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=31
  3. Elkins, Rueckert, McCarty, The Law of One, Session 31.11, http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=31
  4. Elkins, Rueckert, McCarty, The Law of One, Session 87.22, http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=87
  5. Elkins, Rueckert, McCarty, The Law of One, Session 84.22, http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=84
  6. Roberts, Jane, The Nature of the Psyche: Its Human Expression, Amber-Allen Publishing, 1979
  7. ibid.
  8. Elkins, Rueckert, McCarty, The Law of One, Session 31.6, http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=31
  9. Roberts, Jane, The Nature of the Psyche: Its Human Expression, Amber-Allen Publishing, 1979
  10. ibid.
  11. ibid.
  12. ibid.
  13. Roberts, Jane, The Nature of Personal Reality, Amber-Allen Publishing, 1974
  14. Roberts, Jane, The Nature of the Psyche: Its Human Expression, Amber-Allen Publishing, 1979
  15. ibid.
  16. ibid.
  17. Strick, James E, Wilhelm Reich, Biologist, Harvard University Press, 2015
  18. ibid.
  19. ibid.
  20. ibid.
  21. ibid.

Return to Free Library

Return to Human Life Menu

Previous Article                                                                         Next Article